One of the most controversial topics in the field of sentiment analysis is the issue of subjectivity. There are two main camps in this debate: those who believe that sentiment is subjective, and those who believe that it can be objective.
The subjectivists believe that sentiment is a personal opinion, and that it cannot be measured in an objective way. They argue that different people have different opinions, and that these opinions cannot be evaluated in a standard way. The subjectivists also believe that people’s opinions change over time, so it would be impossible to create a static measure of sentiment.
The objectivists believe that sentiment can be measured in an objective way. They argue that there are certain features of text that can be used to determine the sentiment of a document. For example, the objectivists might look at the number of positive and negative words in a text, or the use of emotive language. The objectivists believe that sentiment can be measured in a reliable and repeatable way.
The debate between the subjectivists and the objectivists is likely to continue for some time. However, it is important to remember that both sides have valid points. The subjectivists are correct in that sentiment is a personal opinion. However, the objectivists are correct in that there are certain features of text that can be used to determine the sentiment of a document.